Hearing loss from long term exposure to noise has been recognized as a hazard for a long time. However, what the non-auditory effects of noise are is still not certain. In general, the suspected effects include cardiovascular function (hypertension, changes to blood pressure and/or heart rate), and changes in breathing, annoyance, sleeping problems, physical health and mental health. This wide range of effects has led researchers to believe that noise has the ability to act as a general, non-specific stressor. It is very difficult to pin point what the effects of noise are versus the effects of other general stressors.
In the workplace, non-auditory effects of noise include problems with oral communications. It has also been shown that absenteeism appears to be higher among workers in noisy industries. It has not been concluded whether this is from psychological aversion to noise or from physiological consequences of noise stress.
Non-auditory effects can be divided into two categories - physiological effects and performance effects.
The physiological effects can be temporary or permanent.
Examples of temporary physiological effects are:
All those effects are similar to the response of the body to other stressors.
As for the permanent effects, there is no consensus on the issue: some researchers tend to favour the theory that there are permanent effects, while others are skeptical on the issue.
Noise can interfere with verbal communications and can be distracting and annoying. Below are some examples of how these factors can affect work performance.
Speech intelligibility is the ability to understand spoken words. The presence of noise interferes with the understanding of what other people say. This includes face-to-face talks, telephone conversations, and speech over a public address system.
In order to be intelligible the sound level of speech must be greater than the background noise at the ear of the listener. People with otherwise unnoticeable hearing loss find it difficult to understand spoken words in noisy surroundings.
In noisy work situations, people are able to converse with difficulty at a distance of one meter for a short time in the presence of noise as high as 78 dB(A). For prolonged conversations, the background noise level must be lower than 78 dB(A).
In social situations people often talk at distances of 2 to 4 meters. In such cases noise level should not exceed 55 to 60 dB(A).
| Speech Communication Capability versus Level |
of Background Noise in dB(A)
|Communication||Below 50 dB(A)||50-70 dB(A)||70-90 dB(A)||90-100 dB(A)||110-130 dB(A)|
|Face-to-face (unamplified speech)||Normal voice at distances up to 6 m||Raised voice level at distances up to 2 m||Very loud or shouted voice level at distances up to 50 cm||Maximum voice level at distances up to 25 cm||Very difficult to impossible, even at a distance of 1 cm|
|Telephone||Good||Satisfactory to slightly difficult||Difficult to unsatisfactory||Use press-to-talk switch and an acoustically treated booth||Use special equipment|
|Intercom system||Good||Satisfactory||Unsatisfactory using loudspeaker||Impossible using loudspeaker||Impossible using loudspeaker|
|Type of earphone to supplement loudspeaker||None||Any||Use any earphone||Use any in muff or helmet except bone conduction type||Use insert type or over-ear earphones in helmet or in muffs; good to 120 dB(A) on short-term basis|
|Public Address System||Good||Satisfactory||Satisfactory to difficult||Difficult||Very difficult|
|Type of microphone required||Any||Any||Any||Any noise-canceling microphone||Good noise-canceling microphone|
Source: C.M. Harris. Handbook of Noise Control, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Noise is annoying. In noisy environments, people generally prefer to reduce the noise loudness, avoid it, or leave the noisy area if possible. The same noise could be annoying to some people but acceptable to others. There is no definite relationship between the degree of annoyance or unpleasantness of noise and the risk of adverse health effects. For example, very loud music may be pleasant to one group of people and annoying to another group. Both groups will be equally at risk of hearing loss.
Besides loudness of sound, several other factors contribute to annoyance. The following table lists examples of such factors:
|Factors that affect Individual Annoyance to Noise|
|Primary acoustic factors||Sound level |
|Secondary acoustic factors||Spectral complexity |
Fluctuations in sound level
Fluctuations in frequency
Rise-time of the noise
Localization of noise source
|Nonacoustic factors||Adaptation and past experience |
How the listener's activity affects annoyance
Predictability of when a noise will occur
Is the noise necessary?
Individual differences and personality
Source: C.M. Harris. Handbook of Noise Control, 2nd Ed.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Depending of the type of activity, noise can severely affect efficiency of a task performance. The following examples will illustrate this point:
Document last updated on February 16, 2007